Trustees’ Annual Report

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TRUSTEES AND COMMITTEE OF THE NAVAL REVIEW 2019-2020

 

Reference and Administrative Details.

 

  1. The Charity is named ‘The Naval Review’. Its Charity Registration Number is 214610.

 

  1. Its office is situated at 14 Bedford Road, WELLS, Somerset, BA5 3NH.

 

  1. The Trustees of The Naval Review are:
  • Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope GCB OBE DL(Chairman)
  • Vice Admiral Sir Tim Laurence KCVO CB ADC
  • Rear Admiral S P Williams CB CVO (rtd)
  • Rear Admiral S Ancona CBE (rtd)
  • Rear Admiral A P Burns OBE
  • Captain D I Burns RN
  • Captain A H Talbott RN (rtd)
  • Professor S W Haines Royal Navy
  • Hon Captain James Sproule RNR (Appointed 6 February 2020)

 

  1. The officers of the Charity are:
  • Editor: Rear Admiral B N B Williams CBE (rtd)
  • Assistant Editor: Commodore T R Harris RN (rtd)
  • Book Reviews Editor: Dr James Bosbotinis
  • Secretary-Treasurer: Mrs Emma Rowlands

 

  1. Other relevant organisations which support The Naval Review are:

 

  • Banker:

The National Westminster Bank plc

South Kensington Station Branch

PO Box No. 592

18 Cromwell Place

London SW7 2LB

 

  • Independent Examiner:

PN Independent Examinations

5 Nursery Road

Bedhampton

HAVANT

PO9 3BG

 

  • Investment Management:

Quilter Cheviot

One Kingsway

LONDON

WC2B 6AN

 

Structure, Governance and Management

 

  1. The Charity was established under the terms of a Trust Deed dated 19 September 1927 amended by a Deed of Variation dated 12 May 2016. This constitutes its governing document.

 

  1. The number of Trustees is set by the Trust Deed at not less than three and not more than seven or such other number as the Trustees may think fit. They are recruited as required from among the longer-serving subscribers to The Naval Review and serve for an initial term of four years; they may be re-appointed for two further periods of four years.  The Chairman is always a senior retired naval officer of Flag Rank.

 

  1. The Trustees meet as required, but not less than twice a year. They take advice from a committee drawn from subscribers of all ranks that primarily supports the Editor.  The committee consists of the following persons:

 

  • Captain K Rowlands PhD RN
  • Brigadier C S Middleton MBE RM
  • Commander A E J Livsey RN (Resigned November 2019)
  • Lieutenant Commander G D Franklin RN (rtd)
  • Lieutenant A J Christie RN
  • Captain A Claxton RM

 

  1. All policy decisions, in particular rates of honoraria paid to the officers and subscriptions, are taken by the Trustees. The day-to-day production of the journal, the administration and financial affairs of the Charity, and the running of the Charity’s website are carried out by four officers: the Editor, the Secretary-Treasurer, the Assistant-Editor and a Book Reviews Editor.  The Secretary-Treasurer is the sole employee of the Charity; the Editor, Assistant Editor and Book Reviews Editor are granted an honorarium in recognition of their contribution to the production and management of The Naval Review.

 

Objectives and Activities.

  1. The Trust Deed states the objective as follows:

 

“Encouraging thought and discussion on such subjects as strategy, tactics, naval operations, staff work, administration, organisation, command, discipline, education, naval history and any other topic affecting the fighting efficiency of the Navy but excluding the material aspects of the technical sciences and in the hope that it would help to build up that body of sound doctrine which is so essential to success in war and to provide a means of expression and discussion within the Service.”

 

The Trustees seek to pursue this objective by promoting among its subscribers imaginative thinking, research, critical analysis, correspondence and informed debate on naval matters, in order to support the efficiency of those in the Naval Service (Royal Navy, Royal Marines, Royal Fleet Auxiliary and RN and RM Reservists).

 

  1. This aim is paraphrased on the title page of every issue of The Naval Review journal and on the Naval Review website, as follows:

 

“To promote the advancement and spreading within the Service of knowledge relevant to the higher aspects of the Naval profession.”

 

  1. The Trustees have complied with their duty to have due regard to the guidance on public benefit published by the Charity Commission. Noting the Trust Deed (paragraph 10 above) the Trustees remain satisfied that through research, analysis, writing and debate subscribers transfer knowledge that strengthens the intellectual capacity of the armed services in the public interest, to the benefit of national security.  The Trustees are actively pursuing means to expand the educational aspects of the activities of The Naval Review in pursuit of its charitable purpose.  In that, clarity in its relationship, as an independent charity, with the Royal Navy is critical.  Rejuvenation and codification of this linkage mechanisms to promote freedom of discourse has been agreed (April 2019) and captured in the following agreement with the Royal Navy:

 

“The Royal Navy and the Naval Review have enjoyed over a century of a unique relationship.  In respecting this special relationship, and in acknowledgement of constraints imposed on serving members by established MoD communications policy, the Naval Review will remain limited to membership by subscription only.  But such agreement is on the clear understanding that the Naval review will sustain its independent voice and continue to encourage reasonable challenge to accepted policy amongst and by its members.”

 

  1. The following are eligible to subscribe: officers and ratings, active or retired, of the Armed Forces of the Crown and the Commonwealth, and their Reserves; also members of the Royal Corps of Naval Constructors, and officers and ratings of the RMAS and RFA Service; and civil servants who hold or have held appointments in the Naval Commands, or appointments with a Naval Connection in the Ministry of Defence Headquarters or the Defence Equipment and Support (formerly the Procurement Executive); and officers and ratings, active or retired, of the Armed Forces of certain nations with which the United Kingdom has strong military connections.The necessary restrictions on those who can subscribe have no bearing on the public benefit delivered by The Naval Review.  In fact, significant effort has been committed to the creation of a fully searchable archive of all issues from 1913.

 

  1. The prime activity of the charity remains the quarterly publication of a journal, The Naval Review. This has now been published continuously since January 1913 when the Trust’s forerunner, a Corresponding Society named The Naval Society, was established with similar objectives.   The Charity’s web-site provides subscribers with access to archive material, and also provides a more immediate discussion forum than the quarterly journal can provide.  However, the journal itself remains the journal of record.  For a small charge, material more than ten years old is available for one month to anybody having access to the internet.  All the indications are that this provides a valued source of research material to the wider community and, in particular, academics interested in maritime affairs.

 

Achievements

 

  1. The last four years can be summarised as one of evolution for the Review. Financially relatively sound, the clear challenge for the Review was, at the beginning of this period, to address: rejuvenation of the membership (bringing in new cohorts of serving junior officers); rejuvenation and development of the Review’s relationship with the Naval Service; adapting to the realities of modern media outlets and formats; reforming management processes (including building in redundancy); improving compliance with all statutory requirements; and, critically, enhancing the quality and scope of the discourse of the Review.  In all respects the Review has achieved substantial progress.  But challenges regarding capture of junior membership and enacting fully elements of the RN-NR codification remain outstanding albeit progressing at a slower pace.

 

As part of the tool set for encouraging member achievement, in particular younger member achievement, the sponsorship of annual awards and prizes remains under development.  Currently the offer is:

 

  • The annual award of £250 for the best article published in the journal by a junior officer. The prize has been renamed The Clive Richards Prize in recognition of a generous donation of shares the income from which provides the funds for this award.

 

  • Enhanced prizes to be awarded to young officers who have authored articles of particular merit.

 

  • A competition for the award of an annual fellowship to allow a junior officer of the Royal Navy or Royal Marines to undertake a six-week period of study in defence establishments in Australia on a subject of mutual interest to the Royal and Royal Australian Navies as part of his or her professional development. On completion, the successful candidate submits a paper for publication in the journal.  Ten fellows have undertaken studies in Australia between 2010 and 2019.  A eleventh fellow has been selected for 2020 although his trip has been postponed due to Coronavirus.  This fellowship continues to be generously sponsored by Ultra Electronics.

 

  • An annual cash prize of £250 for the Naval student on the MSc Technology (Maritime Operations) course at Kingston University who provides the best academic paper published in The Naval Review on a topic relevant to their career.

 

  • Following a generous donation from Matthew Wills, two new annual prizes each of £500 were awarded in 2017 for the first time. The award is made for the best articles published in the journal on the shared history of the Royal Navy and the United States Navy and Royal Navy/United States Navy cooperation in the 21st Century.

 

  • And finally to capture and encourage the Reservist portion of the Service there is now an award of a £500 prize, entitled the Warden Berry prize, for the best article submitted by any serving member of the RNR or RMR.

 

Financial Review

 

  1. Finance. The principal source of income for The Naval Review is subscriptions.  The current number of subscribers is 1629 which is a 3% reduction from the previous year.  It has been the practice to endeavour to balance surpluses and deficits over the cycle of a particular subscription level.  After maintaining annual subscriptions at £38 for three years, the Trustees decided to increase this to £40 from 1 January 2019 and maintain this level for 2020.   In 2019, the General Fund recorded a deficit of £7,701 attributable to a degree by an increase in Editorial and Secretary Treasurer payments.  Overall, during 2019, the market value of investments increased by £16,645 to stand at £146,838 at year end. At their November 2019 meeting, the Trustees made the decision to transfer the investments of The Naval Review to the Quilter Cheviot Global Income & Growth Fund.  In March 2020, the investments lost 16% of their value due to the COVID-19 pandemic but have since recovered slightly.

 

  1. Reserves. Reserves are maintained to provide stability and to ensure that the journal can continue to be published despite a sudden dramatic and unexpected short-term loss on income.  In 2013, the Trustees revised their policy on reserves; it is now intended that reserves should be maintained at a level equivalent to between 18-24 months expenses at the current rate.  Based on General Fund expenditure in 2018, reserves on 31 December 2018 equated to slightly over 24 months expenditure.

 

  1. Risks. A risk register is reviewed regularly, and the Trustees maintain Indemnity Insurance.  The Trustees have assessed that the long-term risks to which the Charity is exposed are mainly financial or relate to maintaining its reputation for providing an outlet for independent thought.  The COVID-19 pandemic will result in uncertainty with respect to the welfare of the British state.  The Review is not immune from that shock but is largely positioned to mitigate most risks consequent of the crisis, certainly into the medium term.

 

Plans for Future Periods.

 

  1. The Trustees undertook a series of projects to mark the centenary of The Naval Review in 2013 and secure the second one hundred years for the Journal and its related activities. This has led to a series of reforms as the Review has adapted to an expanded and reformed output.  With novel means of communicating and debating continuously emerging, standing still is not an option.  A process of continuous evolution has been adopted by the board of Trustees founded on the principle that The Naval Review is the journal of professional record for the Naval Service and professional aspects relating to defence and security, especially in the maritime environment.  The Trustees do not underestimate the challenge of sustaining relevance and credibility.

 

To that end priorities set by the board of Trustees for 2020/21 are as follows:

 

  • Expanded Membership – expansion of overall membership numbers remains key to future viability. In that there is a concurrent need to shift the membership age profile towards building a younger majority to further reinforce the central purpose of the Review, whilst broadening the base where possible amongst other Services and those with an affinity or affiliation to the maritime case.

 

  • PostPandemic Adjustment – addressing, where necessary, the financial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic

 

  • Intellectual Alignment – building on the rejuvenated codification of the special relationship with the Royal Navy, the Naval Review will work to develop key academic links with the Navy through the First Sea Lords’ Fellowship, the RN Strategic Studies Centre and conferences, and through simulating new academic links.

 

  • Broadened Discourse – building on on-line and social media developments, adjustment of the primacy between digital and printed media needs to be considered natural evolution to match the expectation of modern membership. In future increased emphasis on the digital experience means the journal will become increasingly the second strand activity as a journal of professional record for collective wisdom developed in the digital space.

Approved by the Trustees and signed on their behalf by:

 

Sir Mark Stanhope

CHAIRMAN

5 May 2020