Many, if not most, are increasingly overwhelmed by the complexity of the current national debate. Searching for clarity amongst a sea of ideas and conflicting interests appears to be an almost impossible task – with consensus in short supply on how to move forward. In my last editorial I hoped, as the last edition hit the streets, that clarity would have emerged. But perhaps the very ‘wickedness’ of this ‘wicked problem’1 requires unreasonable expectation of levels of compromise in our leaders in their search for an outcome of any sort. Unsurprisingly I can proffer no ‘silver bullet’. We live…
